tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6980474165320223385.post6309280650242383387..comments2023-08-13T01:54:50.121-07:00Comments on Euryphysics: Stabbing Toward a Mathematical Formalization of EuryphysicsBen Goertzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01289041122724284772noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6980474165320223385.post-9447280508522706012018-01-01T18:28:22.796-08:002018-01-01T18:28:22.796-08:00"
the “univalence axiom” here is trying to m..."<br /> the “univalence axiom” here is trying to map a First into a Thirdness of First<br />"<br /><br />Lets take on with this:<br />Property "love", is more present-greater (while relative) in "joy" than in "wisdom" <br /><br />then i got into a chatbot that asked me to hierarchickly order these three elements (shown unordered to me obviously) i replied: joy wisdom and love. <br /><br />...i was right (true) anyway.<br /><br />That could have been my <br />*Tactical addon within a (colective or quantum) equilibrium (being nash-ESS-etc) cos my focus was more periodistic (yang). *Could be my personal own todays' strategy (yin)<br />*Bet for the universal default order (Property love sets) cos my focus was historicist (tao, it matched the machine default selection). <br /><br />(explained in short, cos the example reply is more complex than that since is a yin yang tao one which will need another type mixed from the ones above)Bundlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06861147135521657712noreply@blogger.com